"ମହମ୍ମଦ ଅହମଦ ଖାଁ ବନାମ ଶାହା ବାନୁ ବେଗମ" ପୃଷ୍ଠାର ସଂସ୍କରଣଗୁଡ଼ିକ ମଧ୍ୟରେ ତଫାତ
Content deleted Content added
Hpsatapathy (ଆଲୋଚନା | ଅବଦାନ) ଟିକେNo edit summary |
Hpsatapathy (ଆଲୋଚନା | ଅବଦାନ) ଟିକେ add contents |
||
୧ କ ଧାଡ଼ି:
ଭାରତର ଉଚ୍ଚତମ ନ୍ୟାୟାଳୟଙ୍କ ଦ୍ୱାରା '''ମହମ୍ମଦ ଅହମଦ ଖାଁ ବନାମ ଶାହା ବାନୋ ବେଗମ''' (1985 SCR (3) 844) ମାମଲାରେ ଦିଆଯାଇଥିବା ଫୈସଲା , ଯାହାକି '''ଶାହା ବାନୋ ମାମଲା''' ଭାବେ ମଧ୍ୟ ସାରା ଭାରତରେ ପରିଚିତ, ଭାରତୀୟ ଆଇନ ସଂଦର୍ଭରେ ଭରଣ ପୋଷଣ ମାମଲା ସମ୍ପର୍କିତ ଏକ ବିବାଦାସ୍ପଦ ମାମଲା । ଉକ୍ତ ମାମଲାରେ ଭାରତର ଉଚ୍ଚତମ ନ୍ୟାୟାଳୟ ଜଣେ ତଲାକ ଦିଆଯାଇଥିବା (ଛାଡପତ୍ର) ପୀଡିତା ମୁସଲିମ ମହିଳା ସ୍ୱାମୀଠାରୁ ଭରଣପୋଷଣ ପାଇବା ସପକ୍ଷରେ ରାୟ ଦେଇଥିଲେ । ଏହି ରାୟ ବସ୍ତୁତଃ ଭାରତୀୟଙ୍କ ଦ୍ୱାରା ଆଦୃତ ହେଲେ ବି ଭାରତରେ ରହୁଥିବା ଋଢୀବାଦୀ ମୁସଲିମ ସଂଗଠନ ଏହାର ଘୋର ବିରୋଧ କଲେ । ଭାରତର ତତ୍କାଳୀନ ଜାତୀୟ କଂଗ୍ରେସ ସରକାର ଏହି ଅଳ୍ପସଂଖ୍ୟକ ମୁସଲିମଙ୍କୁ ସନ୍ତୁଷ୍ଟ କରିବାକୁ ଯାଇ ଉଚ୍ଚତମ ନ୍ୟାୟାଲୟଙ୍କ ରାୟକୁ ଅକାମୀ କରିଦେବାଭଳି ଆଉ ଏକ ମୁସଲିମ ବ୍ୟକ୍ତିଗତ ଅଧିନିୟମ କାର୍ଯ୍ୟକାରୀ କରାଇ ଭୀଷଣ ସମାଲୋଚନାର ଶିକାର ହୋଇଥିଲେ ।<ref name="hindu2003">{{cite web|url=http://www.hindu.com/2003/08/10/stories/2003081000221500.htm |title=The Shah Bano legacy |publisher=The Hindu |date=2003-08-10 |accessdate=2018-07-25}}</ref>
== ପୃଷ୍ଠଭୂମି ==
In 1932, Shah Bano, a Muslim woman, was married to Mohammed Ahmad Khan, an affluent and well-known advocate in Indore, Madhya Pradesh, and had five children from the marriage. After 14 years, Khan took a younger woman as [[Polygyny in Islam|second wife]] and after years of living with both wives, he threw Shah Bano, who was then aged 62 years, and her five children out. In April 1978, when Khan stopped giving her the {{INR}}200 per month he had apparently promised,<ref name=wronged>{{cite web|last=Khan|first=Saeed|title='My mother was wronged, gravely wronged'|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/my-mother-was-wronged-gravely-wronged/article1-767905.aspx|publisher=Hindustan Times|accessdate=25 July 2018|date=11 November 2011}}</ref> claiming that she had no means to support herself and her children, she filed a petition at a local court in Indore, against her husband under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, asking him for a maintenance amount of {{INR}}500 for herself and her children. On November 1978 her husband gave an irrevocable [[Divorce (Islamic)|talaq]] (divorce) to her which was his prerogative under Islamic law and took up the defence that hence Bano had ceased to be his wife and therefore he was under no obligation to provide maintenance for her as except prescribed under the Islamic law which was in total {{INR}}5,400.{{sfn|Seyla Benhabib|2002|p=91-92}} In August 1979, the local court directed Khan to pay a sum of {{INR}}25 per month to Bano by way of maintenance. On 1 July 1980, on a revisional application of Bano, the [[Madhya Pradesh High Court|High Court of Madhya Pradesh]] enhanced the amount of maintenance to {{INR}}179.20 per month. Khan then filed a petition to appeal before the Supreme Court claiming that Shah Bano is not his responsibility anymore because Mr. Khan had a second marriage which is also permitted under Islamic Law.{{sfn|Seyla Benhabib|2002|p=91-92}}<ref name=judgment>{{cite journal|title=Mohd. Ahmed Khan and Shah Bano Begum and Others|journal=Supreme Court Reports|date=23 April 1985|volume=3|series=1985|page=844|url=http://indiankanoon.org/doc/823221/}}</ref>
== ଆଧାର ==
{{Reflist}}
[[ଶ୍ରେଣୀ: ଭାରତୀୟ ଆଇନ]]
| |||